|
| Newsletter | November 2002 |
The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and then denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country. -- Hermann Goering
Wars are poor chisels for carving out peaceful tomorrows. -- Martin Luther King
Negotiations are a euphemism for capitulation if the shadow of power is not cast across the bargaining table. -- George Shultz, Secretary of State under Ronald Reagan
Due to factors outside of our control our e-mailing of our newsletter has been a bit erratic to say the least of late. If you receive this newsletter please e-mail out to anyone you know locally or who you think will benefit from a copy.
Back copies of our newsletter are available on-line on our website. Not all back copies are available yet as we are rebuilding the website. We are currently updating the website. The index is slowly being updated and the search engine will also be updated. Production of newsletter has priority.
Latest version of newsletter usually appears on-line a few days after we have e-mailed out the the newsletter. We will post a notice on Indymedia when available.
We have just added ourselves to the Yahoo list server. If you are getting multiple copies it is because you are on both the listserver and the manual list. The two will be for a time run in parallel, but we will eventually use the automated system only. Please ensure therefore you subscribe.
To subscribe to BVEJ newsletter send a blank e-mail to:
bvej-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To unsubscribe to BVEJ newsletter send a blank e-mail to:
bvej-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Now even easier, subscribe by entering your e-mail address on the BVEJ web page and click the Yahoo Groups button.
Our material may be freely used and quoted provided it is not used out of context and full credit is given to BVEJ.
We have a full set of political, economic and diplomatic methods that should be used to deal with Iraq. Iraq is an important nation and both that nation and the world should not be put at risk without really trying all the other various measures and approaches available. -- Former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev
Most of UNSCOM's findings of Iraqi non-compliance concerned either the inability to verify an Iraqi declaration or peripheral matters such as components and documentation, which by and of themselves do not constitute a weapon or a programme. Iraq, had, in fact, been disarmed to a level unprecedented in modern history, but UNSCOM and the Security Council were unable - and in some instances, unwilling - to acknowledge this accomplishment. -- Scott Ritter, former UN chief weapons inspector
I don't see a direct link between Iraq and the hijackings ... there is no Iraqi angle or infrastructure that we can point to at this stage. -- Major General Amos Malka, head of Israeli intelligence
Mr bin Laden hates Saddam Hussein, regarding the Iraqi leader as a Western-created dictator - a not entirely inaccurate description. -- Robert Fisk
Iraq is a threat to its neighbours: No evidence has been produced. Neighbours feel more threatened by a democratic regime in Iraq and the threat of a good example. If Iraqi oil comes on stream the corrupt House of Saud will collapse. More countries feel threatened by the US than they do by Iraq, a country that possess weapons of mass destruction, and threatens first use against any country to which it takes a dislike. When Iraq has threatened its neighbours it has been with the tacit approval of US/UK, who supplied the weapons and intelligence. When Saddam gassed the Kurds, Tory minister David Mellor was in Baghdad negotiating further weapons sales. Kuwait was engaging in economic warfare against Iraq and stealing Iraqi oil. The Americans gave Saddam the nod and the wink to invade Kuwait.
Saddam Hussein and the Ba'ath Party were installed by the CIA. When Saddam was 'our kind of guy' he could do no wrong.
Saddam Hussein may be a bad guy but he is no fool. He is unlikely to attack his neighbours when he knows what the retaliation will be. But, if he is a dead man anyway, he may be tempted to lash out. For the same reasons Saddam is unlikely to give access to weapons of mass destruction to terrorists as these could just as easily be turned on his regime as they could on the west, in fact more so as he heads a secular regime. Saddam Hussein may be a bad guy but he is not evil. Were Saddam to fall, the regime could be taken over by Muslim fundamentalists, in which case we would have an evil regime. For all the faults we can lodge at the door of Baghdad, it is still a secular regime.
Turkey is a threat to its neighbours. It has illegally occupied northern Cyprus for more than 20 years and is still carrying out atrocities against the few remaining Greek Cypriots. For decades Turkey has been carrying out a war of genocide against the Kurds in Turkish occupied Kurdistan. At the height of the atrocities in the late 1990s, Clinton stepped up military aid to Turkey.
Iraq has weapons of mass destruction: As of 1998, we know this not to be true. The UN Weapons Inspectors told us so. Saddam did not kick the inspectors out, US/UK withdrew them in order to bomb Iraq. What US/UK fear most is that Saddam will grant inspectors free and unfettered access to all the sites they wish to visit. During the last Gulf War, the greatest fear was that Saddam Hussein would enter into negotiations and withdraw from Kuwait before the coalition forces could be assembled. In testimony to Congress, the head of the CIA has told Congress the CIA has no evidence that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, but warned if there are any which are not known about, Saddam may well lash out at his neighbours if the US were to attack Iraq.
We want regime change: What is wanted is regime stability, with Saddam replaced at the top by a more compliant thug.
Bullyboy Tactics: During the Gulf War a lot of arm twisting and worse went on. China was bought off with a trip in from the diplomatic deep freeze and freeing of World Bank loans. China abstained in the UN Security Council. Yemen, who dared to vote no at the UN to war on Iraq, was told it would be a very costly no, all US aid was immediately frozen. In the current diplomatic frenzy, France and Russia have been offered a share of the oil when Iraq falls to US control.
As the Russian ambassador to the UN warned as Chechen terrorists took over a theatre in Moscow, we have more pressing needs of terrorism to address than engaging in a distraction in Iraq.
The foreign minister then asked how long it would take, through a comprehensive review, before we could declare Iraq disarmed. Given the key remaining issues in the missile and chemical areas, I replied, we might have a satisfactory account of Iraq's weapons-of-mass-destruction programme within six to eight weeks. -- Richard Butler, December 1998
The White House's biggest fear is that UN weapons inspectors will be allowed to go in. -- senior US Senate foreign policy aide, May 2002
While monitoring based inspection in Iraq must be expected to last indefinitely, they cannot be expected to last in a vacuum. Unless arrangements are made to address WMD programs in Iran and Israel, as well as the regional proliferation of advanced conventional weaponry, Iraq will never accept perpetual disarmament. -- Scott Ritter, former chief UN weapons inspector, June 2000
The greatest fear of Bush/Blair is that weapons inspectors will go into Iraq. Contrary to the mainstream media crap, Iraq did not kick out the weapons inspectors, they were pulled out by US/UK in 1998 to enable Baghdad to be bombed. The UN has been trying ever since to get the inspectors back.
According to Richard Butler, Head of UNSCOM (the weapons inspection regime withdrawn), prior to pulling out the inspectors, UNSCOM were within 2 months of ridding Iraq of weapons of mass destruction.
If there is fear that Saddam Hussein has amassed weapons of mass destruction, that is grounds for getting the inspectors back as soon as possible.
The bombing campaign of Iraq during the Gulf War did not rid the country of Scud missiles, nor did it eliminate the chemical or biological programme or the nuclear programme. Not our view but that of the US military who conducted a detailed post-Gulf War appraisal. On the other hand the weapons inspectors dismantled the nuclear programme and all but destroyed Saddam's chemical and biological capability.
We need inspectors back in, we also need a monitoring regime. But even this may not be enough. No regime in Iraq is going to for ever be denuded in a hostile world. Iraq is surrounded by enemies: Iran, Turkey, Syria and Israel. What is often forgotten is that the relevant UN resolutions called for ridding the region of weapons of mass destruction.
The Gulf War of 1990-1991 was a disaster for the West as a whole ... Another attack in the present situation would be even more dangerous. -- Lord Healey, former Chancellor and Defence Secretary
You don't understand. Our policy is to get rid of Saddam, not his regime. -- Richard Haas, US National Security Council
Some fear that attacking Saddam would precipitate the very thing we are trying to prevent. -- Joseph Bidden, chair of US Senate Foreign Relations Committee
For expansion of these reasons read Milan Rai's excellent War Plan Iraq (Arrow Publications 2002). Milan Rai, co-founder of Voices in the Wilderness), will be one of the speakers at a Stop the War meeting at Surrey University (see Diary).
In undertaking some form of action, we must ask ourselves what the consequences will be for the people at the wrong end of the guns, for the people who can't escape. Even a very well intentioned act, if it strengthens the forces of repression, is no gift whatsoever, to those whose fate we, in some sense bear in our hands. -- Noam Chomsky
Mass civil disobedience and mass demonstrations helped to bring the war in Vietnam to an end. -- Milan Rai
More people oppose the war on Iraq now than at the equivalent stage of the Vietnam War. The anti-war demo in London at the end of September was one of the largest demos in recent years (BVEJ newsletter #0029 October 2002). The majority of the British people oppose the war, and opposition is growing.
If our leaders have to lie to take us to war then it cannot be a just war.
We believe that as people living in the United States it is our responsibility to resist the injustices done by our government, in our names. .. . Another world is possible, and we pledge to make it real. -- Not In Our Name
People are organizing at all levels. I'm hearing from the older generations that there was nowhere near this level of activism at this stage in the Vietnam War. I'm not surprised that people are coming out against the war. I am surprised at how organized and vocal people are. -- Amy Quinn, co-director Institute for Policy Studies
Across the USA anti-war demos are taking place. At this point in the Vietnam War there was no organised opposition.
Surprise, surprise, anti-terror legislation is being used as a drag-net to pull in anti-globalisation campaigners and opponents of the war in Iraq.
Elizabeth Fernandez, Anti-War Rallies Across U.S.: 8,000 Protesters in S.F. are Part of Resistance Gaining Momentum, San Francisco Chronicle, 7 October 2002
Robert Kuttner, War Protests, Then and Now, Boston Globe, 23 October 2002
Evelyn Nieves, Anti-War Protests Get Louder In Calif., Washington Post, 14 October 2002
Matthew Rothschild, More Anti-War Activists Snagged by "No Fly" List, The Progressive, 16 October 2002
Several web sites have now been established to oppose the war in Iraq. These are a few we know are worth visiting.
Iraq and related books. Some touch on 9-11, Afghanistan, bin Laden, terrorism, US foreign policy.
War Plan Iraq by Milan Rai is an absolute must (hopefully a review soon). Milan Rai, co-founder of Voices in the Wilderness, will be one of the speakers at a Stop the War meeting at Surrey University (see Diary).
William Blum, Rogue State, Common Courage Press, 2000
Andrew and Patrick Cockburn, Out of the Ashes: The Resurrection of Saddam Hussein, HarperCollins, 1999
Noam Chomsky, Deterring Democracy
Noam Chomsky, Rogue State, Pluto
Noam Chomsky, 9-11, Seven Stories Press, 2001
John Cooley, Unholy Wars: Afghanistan, America and International Terrorism, Pluto, 1999, 2000, 2002
Detailed Analysis of October 7 Speech by Bush on Iraq, Institute for Public Accuracy, 9 October 2002
John Pilger, Heroes
John Pilger, The New Rulers of the World, Verso, 2002
Milan Rai, War Plan Iraq: 10 Reasons Why We Shouldn't Launch Another War Against Iraq, Arrow Publications, 2002
Ahmed Rashid, Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia, Yale University Press, 2000
Ahmed Rashid, Bin Laden: How the U.S. Helped Midwife a Terrorist, The Public i, 13 September 2001
Scott Ritter, The Case for Iraq's Qualitative Disarmament, Arms Control Today, June 2000
Matthew Rothschild, The Case Against the Iraq War: A speech by Matthew Rothschild, Editor of The Progressive magazine
Alan Simpson and Glen Rangwala, LATW's Counter-Dossier: The dishonest case for war on Iraq, Labour Against the War
The failed hijack of a theatre in Moscow by Chechan terrorists, and not forgetting Bali, shows why we need a genuine war on terrorism.
Attacking Iraq, is not a war on terrorism, if anything it will create more terrorists. Neither is a a clamp-down on democratic dissent a war on terrorism.
As part of the war on terrorism, there has to be a conscious effort to eliminate the causes of terrorism.
[BVEJ newsletters passim]
Enron was rigging the energy market in California. One of the honchos responsible at Enron was Tom Watt, now US Secretary of the Army.
Dick Cheney cashed out of oil company Hallilburton with $34 million. At Halliburton he was responsible for what Judicial Watch have termed 'cosmetic accounting' which vastly inflated the share price. Cheney cashed out just before the stocks collapsed.
The man charged with heading the Federal sleaze task busting force is himself up to his neck in sleaze. A company of which he as director was involved in ripping off pensioners for their houses and ripping off credit card holders, a widespread systematic deception for which the company has had to pay multimillion dollar settlements. He cashed in his shares just before the share price collapsed, a price that had been kept artificially high.
Those who are suffering most are pensioners who rely on their stocks for their pensions.
Clinton bombed Iraq to hide the fact he was fucking Monica Lewinski, Bush is going to bomb Iraq to hide the fact that he is fucking corporate America.
But hey, what's the problem, after it's all over Bush, Cheney and Co can go back to their old jobs in the oil and defence industries, a job well done.
File on Four, BBC Radio 4, 13 October 2002
Greg Palast, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, Pluto Press, 2002
The Australian prime minister, John Howard, says the atrocity on the island of Bali is "proof" that "the war against terrorism must go on with unrelenting vigour and with an unconditional commitment". What he means is that he will continue to perform his holier-than-Blair role as George W Bush's most devoted, if not universally recognised, foreign gang member. -- John Pilger
In the wake of the bombing of the Sari night club, little has been said about the deaths of the Balianese men and women who make up 40% of the victims, or the injured locals who are left to suffer in third rate hospitals while westerners are flown out. -- SchNEWS
The Sari nightclub is not simply a random target. While the clientele may change throughout the year, the description is essentially the same – drunken, obnoxious, young(ish) Australians. -- SchNEWS
Bali was not 9-11, but to compare the two on the basis of body count is as obscene as the atrocity.
There were two sides on whether or not to blame the bin Laden terror network. There were those who blame bin Laden for everything and others who could not see a connection, ignoring that Indonesia is a Muslim country hosting Islamic fanatics.
After the Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan, the Afghan Arabs as they were known, dispersed to sow their seeds of hate. The same happened when US started bombing Afghanistan. They did not destroy any terror networks, they simply dispersed them to the four corner of the Islamic world and infected the West. And that of course is giving the US the benefit of the doubt, that it was about terror, not oil.
The target was not military. Neither was the Twin Towers. What was hit was a vital Western industry, tourism. With one multiple bomb blast Bali's tourism collapsed overnight. The target was a nightclub full of Aussies, a symbol of Western debauchery filled with racist Aussies.
Why Aussies? Australia is a racist country. Look at the way they still treat Aborigines. The planes taking the wounded out had spare places but they would not take a single local no matter how bad they were wounded. Australia, second only to Blair, was among the first to back TWAT (the War on Terror), was in Afghanistan. Australia kept the corrupt former regime in power in Indonesia.
The worst atrocity in Bali. No. When the previous regime seized power in Indonesia in the 1960s, somewhere between 500,000 to 1,000,000 were massacred. US, UK and Australia provided the support. Per population, Bali suffered the worse.
Where next? Who knows, but UK has so far got off very lightly.
Robert Fisk, This Crime Proves None of Us Are Safe - And Britons May Well Be the Next Targets, The lndependent, 14 October 2002
George Monbiot, Unreality TV: Television coverage of the poor world has all but disappeared, with disastrous consequences for everyone, The Guardian, 22 October 2002
John Pilger, For 40 years, Australian governments have colluded with state terrorism in Indonesia. Now, the Bali outrage allows John Howard to distract attention from his hypocrisy, 17 October 2002
John Pilger, What passing bells for these who die as cattle?" wrote the great First World War poet Wilfred Owen. His famous line might have been written for those who perish in today's secret wars and terrorist outrages, 25 October 2002
John Pilger, The New Rulers of the World, Verso, 2002
Lawrence Pintak, Bush, Bali & the Beirut Connection: Deja vu All Over Again, 23 October 2002, CommonDreams.org
SchNEWS, Sari Sight, SchNEWS, 18 October 2002
Ooops, it seems we got it seriously wrong. We reported recently of the possibility of massive compensation claims against TAG, and wondered aloud why FARA were doing nothing. Well it seems they were doing nothing for very good reasons. Until such times as the Secretary of State declares Farnborough Airport as an airport under the scheme, no claim can be made. The chap who told the story to the local press (moral, never believe what you read in the local press) was talking out of his arse. Grovelling apologies to FARA. [BVEJ newsletter #0029 October 2002]
It will, at some time in the future, be possible to make massive claims against TAG, but please seek advice from FARA.
Rushmoor Environment Panel have prepared a submission to the government's consultation exercise on the future of aviation. Or to be more accurate, rubber-stamped a report by planning official Richard Short. The report and presentation was misleading waffle, the same old discredited 'predict and provide'. Is Short now a mouthpiece for Freedom to Fly as well as TAG? The report also contained a number of serious inaccuracies. In the brief discussion that followed, it was the blind leading the blind, emphasising once again why local residents must be allowed to address council meetings (councillors spent longer discussing fireworks and traffic wardens). The report now goes to Rushmoor Cabinet (5 November 2002).
The week before, the Cabinet endorsed another report by Short, this time on the airfield consultative committee, a statutory requirement should TAG get a CAA licence. Of the 21 seats proposed, 7 are for TAG, 7 for local authorities, 7 for the local community, but out of this 7, local residents only get 3 seats. The purpose of the committee, as set out by the Act, is a forum for local residents to resolve their grievances with the airfield operators.
TAG have now put in two planning applications, one is for risk contours, the other for noise monitoring. Notification of these applications by Rushmoor is noticeable by its absence, some people enclosed within the risk contours (they extend out over the heathland to the west as far out as Church Crookham and to the east over Farnborough and out to Mytchett) have been notified, no one outside of the risk contours. The letter of notification sent out is deliberately misleading. No mention of the fact that we are dealing with the risk of local residents being killed. Of the noise monitoring, no one has been notified. Do you wish to see TAG doing the noise monitoring? [BVEJ #0029 October 2002]
Please create hell with Keith Holland (Rushmoor head of planning). And object. Please pass the word on, cos Rushmoor ain't going to do it.
Keith Holland Head of Planning Rushmoor Borough Council Farnborough Hants GU14 7JU 01252 398 790 kholland@rushmoor.gov.uk http://www.rushmoor.gov.uk
More trees have gone. Magnificent Scots pines in the garden of Frank Yuen have gone (corner of Alexandra Road and Albert Road). A little bit of arm twisting took place, business expense account Chinese meals at Wings (Chinese restaurant owned by Frank) would be taken elsewhere.
A consultative committee is to be established for Farnborough Airport, not because Rushmoor has any great desire to consult, but because it is a government requirement.
Format will be 21 seats
So far so good, except, Farnham Town Council, local chamber of commerce, Farnborough technical college and Ash Parish council are allocated seats out of the local community allocation leaving only three seats for local residents (and even these seats could be allocated to groups claiming to represent local residents).
This is clearly not good enough. All seven seats allocated to the local community have to be allocated to local residents.
The format has not been set in stone. It has gone before Rushmoor Cabinet (8 October 2002), but although it has been agreed in principle, it now goes before the Environment Panel. It is therefore important that the local community has its say and demands all seven seats.
Suggestion:
Please make your thoughts known to Andrew Lloyd (Rushmoor chief executive) and your local councillors.
Andrew Lloyd alloyd@rushmoor.gov.uk
If we do not get this right, we will have no effective representation on this committee.
Held at the Camden Centre (almost opp Kings X Stn), was a huge success. The place to find those hard to find books which are a must to read, bargain books too, people you have not seen for ages, food supplied by Veggies.
This year the bookfair was held at two locations, the books at the Camden Centre and a series of talks and discussions down the road at the Friends Meeting House. The only problem was few people were aware of the second venue.
Mid-afternoon, those who wanted a break and some 'fresh' air, went down to a demo outside Kings X McDonald's. The evening ended with a fund-raising gig after all the bookstalls had been cleared out.
After Christmas we expect to see town centre meltdown. Several retailers have indicated they will be leaving the town. Many are no longer paying their rent. The last straw for many has been the building work and a centre for dossers to be opened at the northern end of Queensmead.
Rushmoor must be the only council to have colluded in the destruction of its own town centre.
Exxon is the climate baddie (BVEJ newsletters passim), was responsible for removal of the guy in charge of the scientific panel on climate change (BVEJ newsletter #0025 June 2002), is attempting crude intimidation of Greenpeace (BVEJ newsletter #0027 August 2002), stands charged with human rights abuses in Indonesia (BVEJ newsletter #0028 September 2002), has tried to derail the Johannesburg Earth Summit (BVEJ newsletter #0029 October 2002) and now stands accused of killing whales.
Held over until next month.
T5 may be doomed. Not because of any campaign action, but cos of an unholy row that has broken out between BAA and BA.
T5 was for the exclusive use of BA, but with BA unable to fill even its existing slots, what need is there for T5?
But worse to come. With BA shares in freefall, and having been kicked out of the FTSE100 (and never likely to return), can BA afford T5? That is the fear haunting BAA and they have asked BA to put some money upfront. BA have refused.
That is the impasse. BAA are unlike to go it alone as they have admitted that they could not even afford to cover the interest on the bank loans needed to construct T5.
Tens of thousands of UK school children are being finger printed by schools, often without the knowledge or consent of their parents, not because they are guilty or suspected of some crime, but as part of a cost cutting 'automation' of school libraries by the company Micro Librarian Systems. As many as 200,000 primary and high school children from the age of seven have already been fingerprinted.
Primary School Children Fingerprinted, UK Indymedia, 28 July 2002
October 16th was the annual worldwide anti-McDonald's day, where crappy fast food outlets the world over were picketed and free veggie burgers given away. But this year a load of workers got involved too: Workers at six McDonalds in France went on strike, there was a strike in Norfolk, attempts at strikes in three London stores and a walkout in Nottingham. McTrash was dumped back into stores in Australia, locks glued and stores painted in Austria, freezers and toasters sabotaged in Chicago, a mass resignation in Toronto.
Unfortunately, there are serious repercussions for anti-Macs in Mexico: 94 protesters were arrested and detained following complaints from McDonald's. They were accused of damage to an umbrella and window and carrying explosives, ie fireworks. The state has set a bond of $14,000 for each protester, a fee which could buy untold numbers of replacement umbrellas. Financial help is now desperately needed.
Only weeks after announcing (then quickly retracting) that the solution to the annual 'fallen leaves' problem would be to fell all trees on the banks of their rail lines, it looks like Railcrap now have a new enemy. Taking the form of a giant inflatable hamburger, the new menace disrupted services from Newport to London. Railcrap have since announced a national cull of large inflatable hamburgers and of any giant inflatable clowns that might be making them.
The councillors were voting on an application when not all the facts were laid out on the table. They are being manipulated by the officers of the council. -- Janet Leggett
We will be contacting the chief executive at Rushmoor with another request for a full investigation of the planning department and we want to see a halt to planning application itself until its been looked into properly. -- Janet Leggett
AMPLE (Aldershot Manor Park Lobby for the Environment) was formed in September 2001 with the aim to strengthen the voice of the local people against a Council that so evidently did not care, a Council that was determined to force the Manor Park Annexe development with all it's negative consequences upon local people, regardless of the impact this would have on the environment. -- AMPLE
Manor Park and Innisfail Laundry are both down on the planning agenda (30 October 2002) for APPROVE. The agenda could have been written by the developers, as it is a promotion for what they want, everything else is either played down or not mentioned at all.
Manor Park is within a Conservation Area. No development should take place in a Conservation Area other than that which enhances the area. A grotty Barratts housing estate does not qualify as enhancing the area. The report produced by those opposed to the development gets not a mention.
Had the points raised by AMPLE been raised, the planning committee would have read of the conflict of interest of Rushmoor chief executive Andrew Lloyd (who just happens to be a college governor), how the development fails government planning guidance on numerous counts, fails Hampshire policy on numerous counts, fails the Local Plan on numerous counts, in particular the protection of urban green open space. Stag beetles are a protected species, no mention of the level of protection, including EU directives, no mention of the wildlife value of the site and the pleasure it brings to young and old. The area suffers poor air quality, the unwanted development can only make this worse.
As usual the lack of consultation, bodies claimed to have been consulted have not been consulted. A so-called public consultation exercise and exhibition lacked the relevant plans.
The Manor Park site was bought in 1920s by Aldershot Town Council for the benefit of the local community. It was acquired by the county council, then by Farnborough College of Technology when it became a semi-private bums-on-seats business. The site should not be sold to bail out a bankrupt and failing college. Local residents have demanded copies of the deeds from the county council and the college. They have been refused. What is the college trying to hide.
Rushmoor chief executive Andrew Lloyd, serves as a college governor, he also its on the Learning and Skills Council. Both bodies benefit by granting this planning application. Lloyd has personally been involved in pushing through the Manor Park planning application. No mention of this conflict of interest in the agenda.
Innisfail Laundry is a contaminated site. There are a lot of trees. According to the Rushmoor tree officer it is okay to destroy the trees, the contamination can be overlooked. Concerns raised by the environment agency are dismissed out of hand, as are environmental concerns raised by BVFoE. Neither reports are placed before the committee.
There is growing awareness that we have a rotten planning department, a department that falls over backwards to promote the schemes of developers.
How is it planners can get away with blatantly lying? Why do the councillors do nothing?
In Aldershot, the planners have been accused of misleading the councillors. Now where have we heard that before?
Councillors have an oversight function. What are they doing to investigate this rotten department? Nothing.
There is now a growing chorus for an independent investigation of this rotten department. Along with others we wish to see the Audit Commission brought in.
Rebecca Chard, 'Councillors were misled', Aldershot Mail, 22 October 2002
Simon Coughlin, Manor Park battle nears end, Aldershot Mail, 29 October 2002
Assessment of the Performance of Rushmoor Borough Council in the Matter of the Proposed Development of the Manor Park Annexe, Ample, 24 October 2002
@nti copyright - information for education and action - copy and distribute